ProV1. Gay or Nay?

It seems there are differing opinions on the real manliness of the regular ProV1 ball. In true GR tradition, the only way to settle the matter is by poll.

I have used 4 responses so there is a varying degree of gayness for those who are undecided.

[QUOTE=lorenzoinoc]Great idea. Now we just need the poll.[/QUOTE]
Give me a break, I was typing as fast as my two finger style allowed.

omen plays the regular prov1 as well. just fyi.

I wasn't going to get on you, but then I remembered, WTF, this is GR.

I think the time for Titleist to steal more technology so their ball can keep up with the other brands may be winding down.

I just noted that the 'gamer' option is a pink bar. Ironic?

[QUOTE=bjdrivers]omen plays the regular prov1 as well. just fyi.[/QUOTE]
I think he plays the X. He just refers to them as ProV1 because he doesn't think anyone on GR would be gay enough to use a regular so didn't think he needed to differentiate. On GR if you say 'ProV' it goes without saying you are referring to the X.

he plays the regular, he said he doesn't like red on his ball either.

In NaH's review of the DT So/Lo ball he said quote:

'Summary:
Probably titleist's best offering. As an all round ball these are better than the ProV1 or X, particularly for weekend conditions. They provide good distance (heaps longer than the X for the majority of golfers), good spin and soft feel. They are surpisingly good around the greens for a surlyn ball (check batter than the over hyped X), and feel great off the putter. If titleist doubled the price of these and paid a couple of professionals to play them they'd probably be more popular with the low markers than the X. Unfortunately the low markers cannot put a ball into play without the re-assurance of a tour player using the same ball."

So, do we need to do another poll on if the DT So/Lo is a man's ball & the x is a hacker ball?

[QUOTE=bjdrivers]In NaH's review of the DT So/Lo ball he said quote:

'Summary:
Probably titleist's best offering. As an all round ball these are better than the ProV1 or X, particularly for weekend conditions. They provide good distance (heaps longer than the X for the majority of golfers), good spin and soft feel. They are surpisingly good around the greens for a surlyn ball (check batter than the over hyped X), and feel great off the putter. If titleist doubled the price of these and paid a couple of professionals to play them they'd probably be more popular with the low markers than the X. Unfortunately the low markers cannot put a ball into play without the re-assurance of a tour player using the same ball."

So, do we need to do another poll on if the DT So/Lo is a man's ball & the x is a hacker ball?[/QUOTE]
Dredging up a review from 2005 has no relevance to this poll, or the content of this poll (although I applaud your tenacity to go to those lengths to discrdit me). That Not a Hacker guy from then doesn't sound anything like me. I think you should stick to the present. I don't think any of us would want to be judged by what we wrote (or bagged) in the past,

[I]Reviewed by: [B]bjdrivers[/B] , Shoots in the [B]80s[/B]

Model Reviewed:
[B]PING[/B] i/3 Blade JZ Stiff

Summary:
My years of ho'ing irons is now over. I have finally found a player's [B]cavity[/B] that fits my game. I scored a full set of these on ebay (3-LW) in black dot which fits me. These irons offer [B]plenty of forgiveness [/B]for a decent player. They have the best feel I've ever felt for [B]cast irons[/B]. They are laser beams when you are swinging well, and offer [B]forgiveness[/B] when you aren't. Can't ask for more than that. In fact [B]my whole bag is PING now [/B]and I'm playing my best golf ever. The i/3's are as good as any new irons offered by PING. I love them.[/I]

would we BJ?

absolutely, notice i said CAST irons. they are indeed the best cast irons i've played.

Poll NAH Gay or Nay I think Yea

Play the TopFlite gamer if you want a very good three piece ball that only costs $20 a dozen.

[QUOTE=groundhogday]Poll NAH Gay or Nay I think Yea

Play the TopFlite gamer if you want a very good three piece ball that only costs $20 a dozen.[/QUOTE]
So tell me GHD, is that avatar picture representative of your fondness for fondling small furry animals?

We clearly need a poll to see whether people think online polls are gay, but I'm afraid to start one because I live in deathly fear that someone on this board might question my sexuality.....

[QUOTE=dorkman53]We clearly need a poll to see whether people think online polls are gay, but I'm afraid to start one because I live in deathly fear that someone on this board might question my sexuality.....[/QUOTE]
C'mon DM, if you don't have your sexuality questioned at least once a day here you're not considered a real member. Being called gay is one of the highest GR compliments you can get.

[QUOTE=Not a hacker]C'mon DM, if you don't have your sexuality questioned at least once a day here you're not considered a real member. Being called gay is one of the highest GR compliments you can get.[/QUOTE]
But it is so HUMILIATING to be called "gay" on an internet board. What if I ran into one of those people on the street who had called me that? The "I'm Dorkman53 from Golfreview" badge I wear everywhere would be a dead giveaway.......

[QUOTE=Not a hacker]Dredging up a review from 2005 has no relevance to this poll, or the content of this poll (although I applaud your tenacity to go to those lengths to discrdit me). That Not a Hacker guy from then doesn't sound anything like me. I think you should stick to the present. I don't think any of us would want to be judged by what we wrote (or bagged) in the past,

[I]Reviewed by: [B]bjdrivers[/B] , Shoots in the [B]80s[/B]

Model Reviewed:
[B]PING[/B] i/3 Blade JZ Stiff

Summary:
My years of ho'ing irons is now over. I have finally found a player's [B]cavity[/B] that fits my game. I scored a full set of these on ebay (3-LW) in black dot which fits me. These irons offer [B]plenty of forgiveness [/B]for a decent player. They have the best feel I've ever felt for [B]cast irons[/B]. They are laser beams when you are swinging well, and offer [B]forgiveness[/B] when you aren't. Can't ask for more than that. In fact [B]my whole bag is PING now [/B]and I'm playing my best golf ever. The i/3's are as good as any new irons offered by PING. I love them.[/I]

would we BJ?[/QUOTE]

LMAO :D

BJ & NAH that was [B][I]PRICELESS[/I][/B]!!!

Great work guys :thumbsup:

Just what the golf discussion needs another homphobic post by an insecure moron.

Two points:

1 - I've always preferred the Callaway ball to the Pro-V, which was recently busted for copying it.

2 - Titleist and Pinnacle are both made by a company called Acushnet. Between the two brands, Acushnet has like 70% market share. Titeist has promised to put out a "new" Pro-V which does not rely on stolen technology. Gay or not gay, it won't matter, tons of drones will buy the new Pro-V (at 40-48 bucks a dozen) and spent time gettting all giddy over the "How do you mark your titleist?" commercial. Can't you just hear them? "Wow-Wie! Zack Johnson and I mark our Titleist the same way!" As they wipe the snot from their nose and wonder why they've never seen a naked woman.

A special thanks to fred3 for legitimizing this thread.
Due to the Titleist ban, I can't really comment on whether or not the regular ProV1 is gay. I've got a ball fitting scheduled in the next week, whenever I pick up my new irons. I'll go for the premium spectrum and hit driver, mid-iron, and sand wedge. The guy measures ball speed, spin, launch angle and carry distance. He uses a software program to determine other things like the apex and trajectory. We'll see what the numbers say, but I'm not sure this will effectively pick out my ideal ball. It will likely just exclude a few and it will be my decision as to what I want a ball to do.

the HX Tour is indeed better than the prov1, but its no where near durable enough for someone that has to actually buy them. the new touri series may be better.

Another post from Fred on one of my threads. I'm starting to get a knack of drawing him out.

Speaking of people hard to draw out, I just realised that LC3 failed to put in his usual annual Christmas appearance this year. I guess GR had no christmas miracles in 2008.

My answer wasn't among the choices.

Buying the Pro V1 is a good way of getting only twelve balls for the price of twenty-four Top Flite Gamers (which play just as well for me). No thank you.

[QUOTE=NiftyNiblick]My answer wasn't among the choices.

Buying the Pro V1 is a good way of getting only twelve balls for the price of twenty-four Top Flite Gamers (which play just as well for me). No thank you.[/QUOTE]


I agree with this. There's no way an ordinary ProV1 is worth twice as much as a Gamer. The Gamer is IMO the best ball for the money available right now. It may not have the greenside spin of the ProV1 but you can more than compensate for that by using a little bit more loft.



FON

are great if you're 250+ carry off the tee, if you know your short iron yardages down to +/- 3 yards, and are a low single digit handicap. If you're not all of the above, then urethane covered balls ( Pro V, Nike 1, HX1,..... ) are not for you, and are the biggest fraud ever perpetrated on the golfing public. The average amateur golfer will gain enough yardage off the tee with a surlyn covered ball to have at least one less club on approach on par fours and par fives, and on par threes will have be able to swing easier if they use a surlyn covered ball. Combine this with the fact that the average amateur will get at least one club less distance with his/her short irons by using a urethane ball vs. a surlyn ball and it's just hype that's selling most of the high end balls nowadays. I know most won't agree with this because the net's full of guys that text a good game, but personally I'll stick with my NXT's. Word

I played yesterday and was using my favourite non gamer, the D2 Distance (the old model, not sure how the 'freak' plays). I found these balls to be sweet from the first time I hit one, but after yesterday I must say I'm seriously considering bagging them as my full time gamer. They are stupid long off the driver and feel awesome off the putter. They are also sweet off the irons and I was getting to stop dead on the greens with a full shot from 6 iron down. They aren't quite as checky on chips, but I rarely play courses with greens fast enough to worry about checking it up, in fact I gain from the slightly extra roll as you ar short more times than long from around the green.

FON, I have used the D2 feel which is the old version of the gamer and liked that too, but for my taste the slightly firmer feel of the Distance was a better fit for me, and the Distance is flat out longer than any other ball ou there. Having said that, I can certainly understand why you are bagging the gamer, as I found the old 'feel' D2 to still be a real good ball but just not as good as the Distance. It's probably like comparing the regular V1 (gamer) with the V1X (Distance), both great balls but a matter of personal taste. It certainly doesn't hurt that they are about half price of urethane covered premium balls either.

WTH?

I'm gonna have to pick some of these up again. I got a box of the Feel when they first came out and didn't hate them..

I saw some Distance ones at wal-mart last week. maybe I'll buy a few boxes and fill my bag with them.

[QUOTE=Not a hacker]I played yesterday and was using my favourite non gamer, the D2 Distance (the old model, not sure how the 'freak' plays). I found these balls to be sweet from the first time I hit one, but after yesterday I must say I'm seriously considering bagging them as my full time gamer. They are stupid long off the driver and feel awesome off the putter. They are also sweet off the irons and I was getting to stop dead on the greens with a full shot from 6 iron down. They aren't quite as checky on chips, but I rarely play courses with greens fast enough to worry about checking it up, in fact I gain from the slightly extra roll as you ar short more times than long from around the green.

FON, I have used the D2 feel which is the old version of the gamer and liked that too, but for my taste the slightly firmer feel of the Distance was a better fit for me, and the Distance is flat out longer than any other ball ou there. Having said that, I can certainly understand why you are bagging the gamer, as I found the old 'feel' D2 to still be a real good ball but just not as good as the Distance. It's probably like comparing the regular V1 (gamer) with the V1X (Distance), both great balls but a matter of personal taste. It certainly doesn't hurt that they are about half price of urethane covered premium balls either.[/QUOTE]


I can understand your preference for the Distance over the Gamer, you do play in a much warmer climate than I do after all. I don't mind the firmer feel of the Distance myself, I just really like the extra check I get on longer approaches with the Gamer. I like the way they putt better than the Distance too - I prefer a softer ball on the greens, gives me better feedback.

Doesn't hurt that the Gamer is also ridiculously long as well - not quite up there with the Distance, but I'm not exactly hurting for yards. I need the help with control on approaches more than I need a few more yards.

For half the price of ProV's, I think they are more ball than most of us amateurs will ever need.



FON

[QUOTE=FreakOfNature]I can understand your preference for the Distance over the Gamer, you do play in a much warmer climate than I do after all. I don't mind the firmer feel of the Distance myself, I just really like the extra check I get on longer approaches with the Gamer. I like the way they putt better than the Distance too - I prefer a softer ball on the greens, gives me better feedback.

Doesn't hurt that the Gamer is also ridiculously long as well - not quite up there with the Distance, but I'm not exactly hurting for yards. I need the help with control on approaches more than I need a few more yards.

For half the price of ProV's, I think they are more ball than most of us amateurs will ever need.



FON[/QUOTE]
I like a soft feel off the putter too, but my putter has an aluminium face so it's pretty soft to start out with, and the D2 'feel' was a little too soft off the putter. Interestingly I didn't find any better check on full shots with the 'feel' than the Dsstance, but the gamer might have more check than either. I just found the Feel to be a little softer feeling on all shots, a littel better check around the greens, and a little shorter off the tee, but still probably the second longest ball out there behind the Distance.

I think you are right about the D2's having plenty of game, and I honestly think if low markers used them they would be pleasantly surprised and would keep them in the bag (except for courses with very slippery greens). I'm gonna game the D2 and see if I can put together some good scores just to confirm to myself that they are as good a ball as the premiums for my game.

[QUOTE=Not a hacker]I like a soft feel off the putter too, but my putter has an aluminium face so it's pretty soft to start out with, and the D2 'feel' was a little too soft off the putter. Interestingly I didn't find any better check on full shots with the 'feel' than the Dsstance, but the gamer might have more check than either. I just found the Feel to be a little softer feeling on all shots, a littel better check around the greens, and a little shorter off the tee, but still probably the second longest ball out there behind the Distance.

I think you are right about the D2's having plenty of game, and I honestly think if low markers used them they would be pleasantly surprised and would keep them in the bag (except for courses with very slippery greens). I'm gonna game the D2 and see if I can put together some good scores just to confirm to myself that they are as good a ball as the premiums for my game.[/QUOTE]

Hey Nah, you got me interested in the D2 so I looked up the specs. The compression of the gamer is 88, similar to the regular pro v1? However the distance ball is only 58. What do you think about this. Is this the normal compression of "distance" balls?

[QUOTE=oldplayer]Hey Nah, you got me interested in the D2 so I looked up the specs. The compression of the gamer is 88, similar to the regular pro v1? However the distance ball is only 58. What do you think about this. Is this the normal compression of "distance" balls?[/QUOTE]
Can't explain this. The "feel', definitely feels softer than the Dustance, so don't understand the compressions. As for your toher questions, I think most of the distance balls on the market do have low compression, because the lower compressions allows weaker players to compress the ball and get more distance.

Where did you find these specs? I'd love to know a site that lists these types of specs.

[QUOTE=Not a hacker]Can't explain this. The "feel', definitely feels softer than the Dustance, so don't understand the compressions. As for your toher questions, I think most of the distance balls on the market do have low compression, because the lower compressions allows weaker players to compress the ball and get more distance.

Where did you find these specs? I'd love to know a site that lists these types of specs.[/QUOTE]

It was on the actual top-flite website. They have all their different balls (new ones) with detailed specs. BTW the 88 compression was for the gamer, not the feel. While you're there check out the Diva, it might be perfect for Edgey.

Just had a look at that site, very informative. The Freak is a fair bit higher compression than the D2 Distance, so I'm assuming they will play differently. I might have to stock up on D2's before they run out. I also noted that the Feel had a much thinner cover than the Distance, which could account for the softer feel of the Feel. There is lots of interesting things on that site. I can't believe they are still making yellow balls. I rememebr in the early eighties yellow and ornage balls were huge. I wonder why they lost their appeal?

the prov is for seniors who do not generate enough club head speed to fully compress the x. i cant comment on the stolen technology part but i will say that it will cause me to switch to another company, CHEATING and STEALING cant belong in as pure a bag as Mine. ( i have no titleist golf balls anymore) new prov made by same lying cheating stealing company. I hear the Callaway i tours are supposed to be nice. I will be testing once i get a swing that would give me credible results. Although i'm not terribly fond of the hex dimple look. Till then i will be playing hand made featheries.

Omen,