How many ways can you spell "BLOWOUT?"

Now even Democrat pollsters and advisers are seeing a situation that is downright scary! Instead of 1994, (when Republicans won everything and took over both House and Senate) under Clinton, Obama may have brought on a 1894 landslide--that results in 100+ Democrat seat losses, overwhelming majorities in both House and Senate-- and the ability of Congress to basically cut the utilities to the White House and gas for Air Force One! A congress this strong can strangle a president-- "sign or else!" AND, the momentum will be there into 2012. Obama will NOT get the nomination for President again. GO AWAY, you killed us!

The bad thing for Obama that didn't happen to Clinton is that the Republicans are PIZZED! They were "dissed" and they want revenge. Obama basically slapped them away when they wanted to compromise, saying only "I WON!"

Standby Mr. Obama (or whatever your real name is) because you are going to hear "I WON!" a few hundred times from "young guns" who believe that he is illigitimate as I do! Suddenly that belief is no longer going to be extreme or laughable-- it will be what those in power think.

Gonna be fun to watch.

Larry

[QUOTE=Larryrsf]Now even Democrat pollsters and advisers are seeing a situation that is downright scary! Instead of 1994, (when Republicans won everything and took over both House and Senate) under Clinton, Obama may have brought on a 1894 landslide--that results in 100+ Democrat seat losses, overwhelming majorities in both House and Senate-- and the ability of Congress to basically cut the utilities to the White House and gas for Air Force One! A congress this strong can strangle a president-- "sign or else!" AND, the momentum will be there into 2012. Obama will NOT get the nomination for President again. GO AWAY, you killed us!

The bad thing for Obama that didn't happen to Clinton is that the Republicans are PIZZED! They were "dissed" and they want revenge. Obama basically slapped them away when they wanted to compromise, saying only "I WON!"

Standby Mr. Obama (or whatever your real name is) because you are going to hear "I WON!" a few hundred times from "young guns" who believe that he is illigitimate as I do! Suddenly that belief is no longer going to be extreme or laughable-- it will be what those in power think.

Gonna be fun to watch. [/QUOTE]

It seems to me you made this prediction before...

...and were spectacularly wrong.

But then: you must be used to that by now.

:)

Others post here who reside in countries outside the US. THEY are smart enough NOT to post about American politics. Only one posts about things he knows nothing about. Hey, he does that about golf too!

But then he should be working on something productive, should be doing his high school homework, should be trying to get into college, but here he sits-- wasting time hour after hour with nothing to show for it. What would his mother think? I hope soon she cuts him off and forces him to get serious. A few years as a homeless bum might wake AB up.

Larry

[QUOTE=Larryrsf]Others post here who reside in countries outside the US. THEY are smart enough NOT to post about American politics. Only one posts about things he knows nothing about. Hey, he does that about golf too![/quote]

Yes or no, Larry: did you predict a landslide Republican victory during the mid-term elections while Clinton was present?

Do remember that your words are all in the Google Groups archive.

[quote]But then he should be working on something productive, should be doing his high school homework, should be trying to get into college, but here he sits-- wasting time hour after hour with nothing to show for it. What would his mother think? I hope soon she cuts him off and forces him to get serious. A few years as a homeless bum might wake AB up.[/QUOTE]

As opposed to your more productive bragging about how good you'll be (someday) and your raving about your political opponents.

[quote=Larryrsf]Now even Democrat pollsters and advisers are seeing a situation that is downright scary! Instead of 1994, (when Republicans won everything and took over both House and Senate) under Clinton, Obama may have brought on a 1894 landslide--that results in 100+ Democrat seat losses, overwhelming majorities in both House and Senate-- and the ability of Congress to basically cut the utilities to the White House and gas for Air Force One! A congress this strong can strangle a president-- "sign or else!" AND, the momentum will be there into 2012. Obama will NOT get the nomination for President again. GO AWAY, you killed us!

The bad thing for Obama that didn't happen to Clinton is that the Republicans are PIZZED! They were "dissed" and they want revenge. Obama basically slapped them away when they wanted to compromise, saying only "I WON!"

Standby Mr. Obama (or whatever your real name is) because you are going to hear "I WON!" a few hundred times from "young guns" who believe that he is illigitimate as I do! Suddenly that belief is no longer going to be extreme or laughable-- it will be what those in power think.

Gonna be fun to watch.

Larry[/quote]

I always thought a blowout was something that happened after eating too many chili dogs.

C h r i s t i n e O ' D o n n e l l

[quote=mongrel]C h r i s t i n e O ' D o n n e l l[/quote]

O'Donnel might want to read the constitution and the first amendment before her next discussion with university students.

[QUOTE=famousdavis]O'Donnel might want to read the constitution and the first amendment before her next discussion with university students.[/QUOTE]
Republicans typically waste an inordinate amount of time, effort and money trying to co-opt various minorities including college students, the most useless class of mouth-breathers. I know. I was one. Several times.

[quote=mongrel]Republicans typically waste an inordinate amount of time, effort and money trying to co-opt various minorities including college students, the most useless class of mouth-breathers. I know. I was one. Several times.[/quote]

Very true. As Adam Sandler puts it:

When you're in your 20's you say "Let's protest, this is BS!! Down with the establishment!!"

When you're in your 30's you say "Everyone make sure you vote this election!"

When you're in your 40's you say "Man, I'm hungry. Do we have anything to eat in here?"

When your presidential kuntrunn... oh sorry Larry, I meant frontrunner. My apologies. Where was I?... oh that's right, republican presidential candidate Sarah Palin can't even enumerate the Supreme Court decisions that she disagrees with... Looking real promising there chief!

I'm not saying Mr. Obama is do a fantastic job... but let's take a look at the alternative, shall we?

[QUOTE=cjandrews91]When your presidential kuntrunn... oh sorry Larry, I meant frontrunner. My apologies. Where was I?... oh that's right, republican presidential candidate Sarah Palin can't even enumerate the Supreme Court decisions that she disagrees with... Looking real promising there chief!

I'm not saying Mr. Obama is do a fantastic job... but let's take a look at the alternative, shall we?[/QUOTE]
If a drooling mongoloid promised smaller govt. , reduced govt. waste and cut back spending, they would have my vote. I think a lot of people are starting to feel that way.

[QUOTE=Home-slicer]If a drooling mongoloid promised smaller govt. , reduced govt. waste and cut back spending, they would have my vote. I think a lot of people are starting to feel that way.[/QUOTE]


Yep, McCain was not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but he is scrupulously honest and he would have done what Harry Truman did-- which is to surround himself with competents with strong business experience. They would have known how to help businesses create jobs. Unemployment would be in the 7s or below and businesss would be thriving.

AND, as Obama's popularity plummets, those who should have "vetted" Obama during the campaign will belatedly do their job-- and they will discover that Obama is the empty suit that only a few (me) said at the time. They will discover that he is actually of mediocre intelligence and very poor academic accomplishment, that he was given most of his diplomas without having completed the course work or passed the exams. They will report that Obama was repeatedly passed "affirmatively" because he is black and no school administration wanted to fail him. They will discover who paid his tuition to the most expensive and prestigious schools-- and maybe they will discover who put him through in order to "own" an American President.

I think in the next few years we will discover that the greatest and most outrageous hoax in American history was perpetrated on the American people and the world.

And if he finishes his term before a major conflict or crisis reveals that he would NOT respond as Commander in Chief, we will discover that George Soros or another villain who hates America is actually the puppet-master behind Obama.

Mark my words

Larry

[QUOTE=Larryrsf]Yep, McCain was not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but he is scrupulously honest and he would have done what Harry Truman did-- which is to surround himself with competents with strong business experience. They would have known how to help businesses create jobs. Unemployment would be in the 7s or below and businesss would be thriving.

AND, as Obama's popularity plummets, those who should have "vetted" Obama during the campaign will belatedly do their job-- [B]and they will discover that Obama is the empty suit that only a few (me) said at the time. They will discover that he is actually of mediocre intelligence and very poor academic accomplishment, that he was given most of his diplomas without having completed the course work or passed the exams. That he was passed "affirmatively" because he is black. They will discover who paid his tuition to the most expensive and prestigious schools-- and maybe they will discover who put him through in order to "own" an American President. [/B]
I think in the next few years we will discover that the greatest and most outrageous hoax in American history was perpetrated on the American people and the world.

And if he finishes his term before a major conflict or crisis reveals that he would NOT respond as Commander in Chief, we will discover that George Soros or another villain 2who hates America is actually the puppet-master behind Obama.

Mark my words

Larry[/QUOTE]
Only in America could this sort of thing happen. Only in the land of the free, and the home of the brave. God bless America, a nation where anyone can bluff their way into the whitehouse.

[QUOTE=Home-slicer]If a drooling mongoloid promised smaller govt. , reduced govt. waste and cut back spending, they would have my vote. I think a lot of people are starting to feel that way.[/QUOTE]
Just start promising this and you too could be president of America. Even if you have no intentions of upholding your end of the bargain, and it's a physical impossibility. Rememebr when Homer made all sorts of unfundable, ridiculous promises when he was running for Springfield sanitation commissioner? He got voted in.

Anyhow, the blowout that will occur tomorrow is exactly what the Democrats and the Mainstream Press deserve. They brought this on us, they are responsible for the present recession caused by incompetent socialists in charge of the most prolific capitalist economy in world history. They cost American TRILLIONS of dollars, and their noses should be rubbed in the damages that Barney Frank and Chris Dodd, et. al. caused. Liberals whose motive was to "spread the wealth" will not regain power in our lifetime.

We gave them enough rope--and the hanging is tomorrow.

Larry

I'll have a Pepsi... no wait... I'll have a Coke. Hmm, they both have unhealthy corn syrup and are bad for the kidneys but Pepsi gave me a stomach ache last time. Alright, I'll have a Coke.

(and this is different from tomorrow's election I'm not sure how)

[QUOTE=Larryrsf]Anyhow, the blowout that will occur tomorrow is exactly what the Democrats and the Mainstream Press deserve. They brought this on us, they are responsible for the present recession caused by incompetent socialists in charge of the most prolific capitalist economy in world history. They cost American TRILLIONS of dollars, and their noses should be rubbed in the damages that Barney Frank and Chris Dodd, et. al. caused. Liberals whose motive was to "spread the wealth" will not regain power in our lifetime.

We gave them enough rope--and the hanging is tomorrow.

Larry[/QUOTE]
It isn't "Spread the Wealth". Its "Take from those who have it and give it to those who have done nothing to earn it." Necktie parties are too good for most of them, especially Rent-boy pimp Barney. The Arabs have that "thousand cuts" thing developed over the millenia and it sure is nasty.

[QUOTE=Larryrsf]Yep, McCain was not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but he is scrupulously honest and he would have done what Harry Truman did-- which is to surround himself with competents with strong business experience. They would have known how to help businesses create jobs. Unemployment would be in the 7s or below and businesss would be thriving. [/quote]

I wonder what you said about McCain's intelligence [I]prior[/I] to the 2008 election....

[quote]AND, as Obama's popularity plummets, those who should have "vetted" Obama during the campaign will belatedly do their job-- and they will discover that Obama is the empty suit that only a few (me) said at the time. They will discover that he is actually of mediocre intelligence and very poor academic accomplishment, that he was given most of his diplomas without having completed the course work or passed the exams. They will report that Obama was repeatedly passed "affirmatively" because he is black and no school administration wanted to fail him. They will discover who paid his tuition to the most expensive and prestigious schools-- and maybe they will discover who put him through in order to "own" an American President.

I think in the next few years we will discover that the greatest and most outrageous hoax in American history was perpetrated on the American people and the world.

And if he finishes his term before a major conflict or crisis reveals that he would NOT respond as Commander in Chief, we will discover that George Soros or another villain who hates America is actually the puppet-master behind Obama.

Mark my words[/QUOTE]

Will they be as accurate as the sweep of the house and senate you predicted in 2006 (IIRC)?

[QUOTE=Larryrsf]Yep, McCain was not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but he is scrupulously honest and he would have done what Harry Truman did-- [B]which is to surround himself with competents with strong business experience.[/B] They would have known how to help businesses create jobs. Unemployment would be in the 7s or below and businesss would be thriving.

AND, as Obama's popularity plummets, those who should have "vetted" Obama during the campaign will belatedly do their job-- and they will discover that Obama is the empty suit that only a few (me) said at the time. They will discover that he is actually of mediocre intelligence and very poor academic accomplishment, that he was given most of his diplomas without having completed the course work or passed the exams. They will report that Obama was repeatedly passed "affirmatively" because he is black and no school administration wanted to fail him. They will discover who paid his tuition to the most expensive and prestigious schools-- and maybe they will discover who put him through in order to "own" an American President.

I think in the next few years we will discover that the greatest and most outrageous hoax in American history was perpetrated on the American people and the world.

And if he finishes his term before a major conflict or crisis reveals that he would NOT respond as Commander in Chief, we will discover that George Soros or another villain who hates America is actually the puppet-master behind Obama.

Mark my words

Larry[/QUOTE]

Yap, he did a great job with his first pick, the vp. Lost him the presidency. I'm not sure your argument is sound with his first stellar choice.

[QUOTE=Larryrsf]Anyhow, the blowout that will occur tomorrow is exactly what the Democrats and the Mainstream Press deserve. They brought this on us, they are responsible for the present recession caused by incompetent socialists in charge of the most prolific capitalist economy in world history. They cost American TRILLIONS of dollars, and their noses should be rubbed in the damages that Barney Frank and Chris Dodd, et. al. caused. [/QUOTE]

Tell us again, Larry:

Who was it deregulated the banking industry? To what party did they belong?

[QUOTE=poe4soul]Yap, he did a great job with his first pick, the vp. Lost him the presidency. I'm not sure your argument is sound with his first stellar choice.[/QUOTE]
I'm sure that most Republican voters just weren't sure about putting a old man like McCain in when the next in line was Palin. It boggles the mind that she has become the darling of the capitalists. Are they really that dumb to want an imbecile like her in the chair. I'm thinking they have to be using her as the public face, but have no intention of letting her make any decisions whatsoever if she get's elected.

[QUOTE=Not a hacker]I'm sure that most Republican voters just weren't sure about putting a old man like McCain in when the next in line was Palin. It boggles the mind that she has become the darling of the capitalists. Are they really that dumb to want an imbecile like her in the chair. I'm thinking they have to be using her as the public face, but have no intention of letting her make any decisions whatsoever if she get's elected.[/QUOTE]

What amazes me is that dunces such as Larry don't even realize that the moment there's a race for the presidential nomination, if she's in it the kid gloves with which she's been handled by other members of her party are going to come off.

She is going to be savaged by the other people who want the job for themselves.

And I'm going to love every minute of it.

:D

[QUOTE=alangbaker]Tell us again, Larry:

Who was it deregulated the banking industry? To what party did they belong?[/QUOTE]
And which party held Congress when that occurred?

[QUOTE=mongrel]And which party held Congress when that occurred?[/QUOTE]

The only issue that matters is the economy. Both parties are dirty, tainted, and responsible for this mess. The fed keeps creating new debt for main street to keep the mother of all ponzi schemes going a little longer, and congress is doing nothing to stop them. Just vote against incumbents. If you don't send a message nothing will change.

Pretty much what I did. Screw the incumbents.

[QUOTE=poe4soul]Yap, he did a great job with his first pick, the vp. Lost him the presidency. I'm not sure your argument is sound with his first stellar choice.[/QUOTE]

BS. Selecting Palin raised his numbers 10% or more. What lost McCain the presidency was his wishy-washy failure to strongly challenge Obama to reveal his background--and simply refuse to campaign until the press did their job!!! McCain allowed the MSM go to his home in Arizona and rifle through his personal files-- while failing to insist that they do the same at Obama's house!!! How outrageous is that? He failed so show personal resolve, the most important factor in leadership. Obama also failed that-- but he was the favored child of the MSM--and also half black. EVERYONE was afraid to challenge Obama in fear of being tagged, "racist."

It happened exactly as Soros or whoever brought Obama up knew it would.

And now the US has a president that many are unsure is even eligible to be there-- or even that he is a US Citizen.

Larry

[QUOTE=The Purist]The only issue that matters is the economy. Both parties are dirty, tainted, and responsible for this mess. The fed keeps creating new debt for main street to keep the mother of all ponzi schemes going a little longer, and congress is doing nothing to stop them. Just vote against incumbents. If you don't send a message nothing will change.[/QUOTE]

BULLSTUFF!!!! A President Romney, for instance, would have surrounded himself with experienced businessmen, people who understand how small and large businesses work, and what they need to create jobs. Unemployment would be in the 6 range now....

The Obama team includes NOBODY with real business experience. He and his team HATE those with real experience, with real entrepreneural spirit. AND SO.... they have completely failed to give small business owners the confidence they need in order to hire someone....Unemployment would go to 12% under that team.

Larry

[QUOTE=Larryrsf]BS. Selecting Palin raised his numbers 10% or more. What lost McCain the presidency was his wishy-washy failure to strongly challenge Obama to reveal his background--and simply refuse to campaign until the press did their job!!! McCain allowed the MSM go to his home in Arizona and rifle through his personal files-- while failing to insist that they do the same at Obama's house!!! How outrageous is that? He failed so show personal resolve, the most important factor in leadership. Obama also failed that-- but he was the favored child of the MSM--and also half black. EVERYONE was afraid to challenge Obama in fear of being tagged, "racist."

It happened exactly as Soros or whoever brought Obama up knew it would.

And now the US has a president that many are unsure is even eligible to be there-- or even that he is a US Citizen.

Larry[/QUOTE]
WRONG! Once the bump was over and the moderates figured out she was a religous fanatic IDIOT she was done and so was McCain.

[QUOTE=poe4soul]WRONG! Once the bump was over and the moderates figured out she was a religous fanatic IDIOT she was done and so was McCain.[/QUOTE]

Yeah she sure was top of the pops after the old "Hockey Moms" speech but plummeted in the ratings when people saw there was absolutely no substance behind the image/rhetoric.

The foreign policy gaff re Russia and Mr Putin was pure comedy!!!

Then again what would a non American like me know? I should butt out of this conversation.

Yeah, old "we've been to all 57 states" would be much preferable to the 90% popular Governor of Alaska. Obama's thin resume indicated NO ability to do the job of POTUS. The last two years verified that expectation. Accordingly, Obama has been the most incompetent POTUS in US History. He could have done a credible job if he had simply hired business experts and then let them do their thing-- but he remains philosophically against that--against Capitalism. Obama has and continues to bring in ANYBODY with pragmatic business experience, and so the unemployment rate will continue to climb. The REAL unemployment rate in some states exceeds 20%. At about the 25% rate, many societies start rioting in the streets.

President Palin would have done what she did in Alaska-- and today unemployment would be low and dropping. She would have grown into the POTUS job.

Larry

[ATTACH]2521[/ATTACH]

You partisans need to look through the eyes of reasonable independents... how can you still possibly believe in either party? Your agent of change, Speaker Boehner, is a 20 year congressmen who voted for the bailout twice. Good luck with that...

Screw the 2 party system... it failed.