Rate 'er

Printable View

  • 04-17-2012
    buddha33
    Rate 'er
    I figured I'd pass on a little tradition we have at work. Rate this chick on a scale of 0 to 10 in 0.5 increments. Keep in mind that all women in the known universe are part of this 0-10 distribution. Commentary is welcome.

    [IMG]http://www.deardamndiary.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/scarlett-johansson-for-dolce-gabbana.jpg[/IMG]


    [IMG]http://img2.timeinc.net/people/i/2006/gallery/sweetsexy/scarlett_johansson.jpg[/IMG]

    [IMG]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-DU4fAP9TWQU/TfH-b1-RieI/AAAAAAAAUr8/OdIiplT1M9c/s400/scarlett_johansson_no%2Bmakeup.jpg[/IMG]
  • 04-17-2012
    Home-slicer
    Scarlet is a 5.5. I've never understood the appeal. She's a poor man's Charlise Theron. Decent body, though.
  • 04-17-2012
    lorenzoinoc
    Yeah, she can look good or bad. But like alot of NY women she really lacks sensuality. I'd go with maybe a 7.5 because the body's so good. A sock in her mouth and a leash could raise her to an 8.
  • 04-17-2012
    famousdavis
    I've always liked Scarlette. I would give her an 8.5. I think she's way better than Charlise. But, then again, I did see that Charlise movie where she gained all the weight. I think it was called Monster or something. She played a prostitute that kills johns. That kind of killed her for me.

    I've always liked women that are more petite and curvy than tall and thin.
  • 04-18-2012
    Kiwi Player
    Scarlet is a solid 8.5 in my book though I'm surprised you guys are raving about her body. The most recent movie I saw her in was Vicki Christina Barcelona (utter shite BTW) and she was looking decidedly fat for my liking. But she is the total package when she drops a few pounds. Charlize has a much hotter body IMO. She'd probably rate a 9.
  • 04-18-2012
    jt1135
    There is no such thing as a 10. Every woman has some kind of flaw. Scarlett gets an 8.5.
  • 04-18-2012
    buddha33
    [QUOTE=jt1135;268787]There is no such thing as a 10. Every woman has some kind of flaw. Scarlett gets an 8.5.[/QUOTE]

    This is a good statement and good rating. We tested 15 girls (from actresses to porn stars to Playboy Playmates) using a series of pictures for each here at work. The highest average score for the 10 participants was a 9.0 for Megan Fox.

    One conclusion was that the images created by professional photographers, make-up artists, and photoshopping are not attainable in the real world. Here's one extreme example:

    [IMG]http://www.guxed.net/wp-content/uploads/Adriana-Lima-5.jpg[/IMG]

    [IMG]http://d1535dk28ea235.cloudfront.net/preset_65/adriana-lima06.jpg[/IMG]
  • 04-18-2012
    Horseballs
    I think Scarjo's rack deserves a 10. The rest of her is nothing special.
    I don't think that Adriana Lima pic is too bad. She is about as naturally hot as you can get.
  • 04-18-2012
    famousdavis
    This isn't exactly groundbreaking news. Women have been using makeup forever and magazines have been Adobe Photo Shopping images for 15 years now. The best examples I've seen are what they've done with the Kardashian sisters for the new swim wear line. They took 30 pounds off them easily.

    Sometimes you can tell a woman is beautiful with or without the make up. I think Natalie Portman would be beautiful with or without makeup. I also would be that Jennifer Anniston looks pretty good.
  • 04-18-2012
    Kiwi Player
    [QUOTE=famousdavis;268850]This isn't exactly groundbreaking news. Women have been using makeup forever and magazines have been Adobe Photo Shopping images for 15 years now. The best examples I've seen are what they've done with the Kardashian sisters for the new swim wear line. They took 30 pounds off them easily.

    Sometimes you can tell a woman is beautiful with or without the make up. I think Natalie Portman would be beautiful with or without makeup. I also would be that Jennifer Anniston looks pretty good.[/QUOTE]

    Natalie Portman makes my laminated list. Never been fussed about Jennifer Anniston. No wonder Brad dumped her for Angelina. She may be a weirdo psychotic nut job but at least she's hot.
  • 04-18-2012
    Kiwi Player
    [QUOTE=buddha33;268736][B]I figured I'd pass on a little tradition we have at work. Rate this chick on a scale of 0 to 10 in 0.5 increments.[/B] Keep in mind that all women in the known universe are part of this 0-10 distribution. Commentary is welcome.

    [/QUOTE]

    Me and a bunch of my work buddies used to rate the girls in the office on a similar scale. But one of them made the fatal mistake of revealing this information to one of the chicks over Friday night drinks! :eek:

    What a fukking idiot. There was hell to pay!
  • 04-18-2012
    buddha33
    [QUOTE=Horseballs;268849]I don't think that Adriana Lima pic is too bad. She is about as naturally hot as you can get.[/QUOTE]

    Still think that way?

    [IMG]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-zg9RJpK1kWw/Tt7rnH1WrZI/AAAAAAAAAJw/x402DS_Up80/s1600/adriana-lima-without-makeup.jpg[/IMG]
  • 04-18-2012
    buddha33
    [QUOTE=Kiwi Player;268853]Me and a bunch of my work buddies used to rate the girls in the office on a similar scale. But one of them made the fatal mistake of revealing this information to one of the chicks over Friday night drinks! :eek:

    What a fukking idiot. There was hell to pay![/QUOTE]

    Ouch...what a tool.
  • 04-18-2012
    buddha33
    [QUOTE=famousdavis;268850]This isn't exactly groundbreaking news. Women have been using makeup forever and magazines have been Adobe Photo Shopping images for 15 years now. The best examples I've seen are what they've done with the Kardashian sisters for the new swim wear line. They took 30 pounds off them easily.

    Sometimes you can tell a woman is beautiful with or without the make up. I think Natalie Portman would be beautiful with or without makeup. I also would be that Jennifer Anniston looks pretty good.[/QUOTE]

    True, but it begs the question of whether there are perfect 10's if we base our assessments on doctored pics.
  • 04-18-2012
    Horseballs
    [QUOTE=buddha33;268854]Still think that way?

    [/QUOTE]

    Yep, it's just the hair. Dump a bucket of water over her head and she's back to smoking hot.
  • 04-18-2012
    NiftyNiblick
    If this old broad is making home made pasta, then she gets a TEN from me. I have different priorites.[IMG]http://blender.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/CWIG_124.jpg[/IMG]
  • 04-18-2012
    lorenzoinoc
    [QUOTE=NiftyNiblick;268883]If this old broad is making home made pasta, then she gets a TEN from me. I have different priorites.[/QUOTE]

    My day's probably coming if I live long enough.
  • 04-19-2012
    Horseballs
    [QUOTE=lorenzoinoc;268885]My day's probably coming if I live long enough.[/QUOTE]

    Until then, you've got your trio of half naked maids to clean your bathroom.
  • 04-19-2012
    buddha33
    [QUOTE=NiftyNiblick;268883]If this old broad is making home made pasta, then she gets a TEN from me. I have different priorites.[/QUOTE]

    I'd hit that.

    How come they don't mention this horrid psychological shift in the Viagra commercials?
  • 04-19-2012
    lorenzoinoc
    [QUOTE=Horseballs;268896]Until then, you've got your trio of half naked maids to clean your bathroom.[/QUOTE]

    Why do I get the feeling Kiwi's the only one who missed it?
  • 04-19-2012
    Kiwi Player
    [QUOTE=lorenzoinoc;268903]Why do I get the feeling Kiwi's the only one who missed it?[/QUOTE]

    Unlike tai chi golf I saw the 3 scantily clad bath maids.
  • 04-19-2012
    lorenzoinoc
    [QUOTE=Kiwi Player;268919]Unlike tai chi golf I saw the 3 scantily clad bath maids.[/QUOTE]

    That's a relief. I would have PM-d it to you.